The Post-Separation Abuse Podcast
The Post-Separation Abuse Podcast
Hosted by Danielle Black
A direct, evidence-based podcast for people navigating all-things separation and divorce, including; post-separation abuse, family violence, parenting, property settlement and the family law system - with a relentless focus on protecting children and building a life beyond separation. Because, the advice your lawyer gives you is only the beginning. Family law tells you what the system can do. This podcast helps you understand what to seek, what to challenge, what to bring into the room - and how to live with the decisions, and move on with your life, afterwards.
Danielle Black is a specialist post-separation parenting coach and the founder and principal coach of Danielle Black Coaching. Having navigated her own complex separation, and guided hundreds of clients to successful outcomes, Danielle and her coaching team specialise in helping protective parents to optimise the outcome for themselves and their children, and support clients to navigate post-separation situations that other professionals don't properly address.
Drawing on her extensive tertiary qualifications, developmental science, research, trauma-informed practice and both professional and lived experience, she examines how abuse can continue after separation, how systems and professionals respond, and what genuinely informed decision-making and credible advocacy requires when risk, fear or power imbalance is present.
Because understanding family law is not enough.
Having a lawyer is not enough.
A lawyer can advise you about the law, legal process and evidence. But optimising your parenting outcome also requires knowledge of child development, attachment, coercive control and trauma; the capacity to remain strategic under pressure; and the confidence to advocate for what you and your children genuinely need.
This podcast examines all of those layers.
It challenges the assumptions that routinely shape post-separation outcomes: the fixation on 50/50 shared care, the misuse of “friendly parent” ideals, the belief that compromise is always constructive, and the fantasy that engaging the right professional means you can safely hand over the strategy, decision-making and advocacy.
Across the podcast, Danielle explores:
- how post-separation abuse operates through parenting, financial and legal processes;
- what children need after separation - and why adult notions of fairness are an inadequate guide;
- what lawyers and other post-separation professionals were, and were not, trained to understand;
- why standard co-parenting frameworks often fail families affected by coercive control and other forms of family violence and post-separation abuse;
- how to assess the benefits, risks and real-world costs of negotiation, litigation and other pathways;
- how knowledge, capacity and advocacy can materially change outcomes;
- and what comes next, when separation and survival no longer occupy the centre of your life.
Expect direct language, research-backed analysis, practical guidance and a few cuss words - not platitudes, false balance or simplistic promises of justice.
This is not only about understanding what happened in your situation.
It is about making informed decisions now - and becoming the author, and authority, of what comes next.
To go deeper, explore The Post-Separation Parenting Blueprint™, Danielle’s flagship program for parents building the knowledge, capacity and advocacy skills needed to make informed, protective decisions after separation.
Learn more at danielleblackcoaching.com.au.
The Post-Separation Abuse Podcast
119. Parenting without court orders: More options than you might realise
Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.
When parenting arrangements cannot be agreed upon, many protective parents believe they have only two options: give in to what the other parent is demanding or begin family court proceedings.
But those are not the only paths available.
In this episode, Senior Coach Brigid Morgan shares her lived experience of navigating shared-care parenting without formal court orders in a high-conflict post-separation dynamic. She explores the certainty parents may hope court orders will provide, what orders can and cannot realistically achieve, and how a workable arrangement may sometimes be maintained through established care patterns, clear communication boundaries, parallel parenting and careful documentation.
Danielle then joins the conversation to address one of the most difficult questions protective parents face: what happens when the other parent refuses to agree to arrangements or safeguards that you believe are necessary for your children?
Together, Danielle and Brigid discuss:
- Why parenting orders are not always the “golden ticket” they can appear to be
- The false choice between acquiescing and immediately commencing court proceedings
- Parenting plans, established arrangements and the importance of 'status quo' precedents
- Parallel parenting when collaboration is neither safe nor realistic
- Protective measures that may be implemented without court orders
- Holding firm when faced with anger, accusations or threats of legal action
- The difference between avoiding conflict and protecting your children
- Situations in which formal orders and urgent legal advice may be necessary
This episode is not an argument against parenting orders. It is an invitation to question the assumption that court is automatically the only alternative when agreement cannot be reached - and to understand that parenting without orders does not necessarily mean parenting without boundaries, structure or protection.
This podcast provides general educational information and is not a substitute for legal advice specific to your circumstances.
Support: If you are in Australia and need to talk to someone, 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732) is available 24/7. In an emergency, call 000.
Explore the supports offered by Danielle Black Coaching
The Post-Separation Parenting Blueprint™
👉 https://www.danielleblackcoaching.com.au/the-post-separation-parenting-blueprint-1
AI Danielle - Your 24/7 Digital Coach
👉 https://www.danielleblackcoaching.com.au/meet-ai-danielle
1:1 Coaching
👉 https://www.danielleblackcoaching.com.au/1-1-coaching
Claim Your Name™: Burning the Good Girl Contract
👉 https://www.danielleblackcoaching.com.au/the-contract-you-never-agreed-to
The music you hear in this outro is 'Calm is Credible' - an original track created exclusively for the Post-Separation Abuse Podcast and Danielle Black Coaching. You can listen to this song, or download free, by visiting danielleblackcoaching.com.au
About Danielle Black Coaching:
Danielle Black is a respected authority in child-focused post-separation parenting in Australia. With over twenty years’ experience across education, counselling and coaching - alongside her own lived experience navigating a complex separation and family court journey - she supports parents to think strategically, build capacity, and protect their children’s safety and wellbeing within complex legal and relational systems.
Through Danielle Black Coaching, she leads a growing team of specialist coaches and a structured support ecosystem designed to provide professionally held, evidence-informed guidance for parents navigating high-conflict separation and family court processes.
Learn more at danielleblackcoaching.com.au
This podcast is for educational purposes only and not legal advice. Please seek independent legal, medical, financial, or mental health advice for your situation.
Heads Up And What To Expect
Danielle BlackA brief heads up for this episode of the Post Separation Abuse Podcast. You are about to be hearing our senior coach here at Danielle Black Coaching, Bridget Morgan. She's going to be leading you through this week's topic on the post-separation abuse podcast. But please do stay tuned at the end of Bridget's episode because I'm also going to be jumping in with some additional information and insights on this topic.
Shared Care Without Court Orders
Brigid MorganHi, welcome to another episode of the Post Separation Abuse Podcast. I'm Bridget Morgan, one of the senior coaches here at Daniel Black Coaching, and I'm really glad you're here. Today I wanted to talk about something that I think is under discussed in the post-separation abuse space. It's something I also feel personally very connected to because it's been central to my own experience as a separated parent. We're talking about shared care parenting within these dynamics without formal court orders. Now before I go any further, it's really important to say that I have not personally navigated any part of the family court system for parenting matters. I am not a legal expert, and nothing in this episode is legal advice. What I can offer is the perspective of someone who has been navigating shared care parenting in a high conflict situation without formal court orders for a number of years now. I'd like to share a bit about what that looks like from the inside, including the challenges, the uncertainties, and honestly, some things that have genuinely surprised me about how workable it can be in certain situations. So this podcast episode, I'm billing it as part one. I suspect there will be a much longer conversation that will unfold across multiple episodes. This topic has a lot of layers. And when I started to draft the content for this episode, I realized how complex it actually is. So rather than keep putting it off, I thought I would just dive in with a bit of an overview, and then we can unpack some of the nuances and details in future episodes. So keep your eyes peeled for that. What I do want to say as well is that every family is unique. Every former partner is different. Every child is unique. Every situation is unique. So in this general overview today, it's just a starting point. It's not a complete map. The complete map has to be drawn with you for your specific situation and your specific child or children. And that's where individual coaching comes in. But more on that later. For now, let's start with a simple question.
The Fantasy Of Final Orders
Brigid MorganSo have you ever fantasized about getting court orders for parenting? Now, I know that sounds a little bit of a strange remark, but when you are in the thick of it, of a high conflict situation, and you are a child-focused protective parent, sometimes those core orders can feel a bit like a dream. They it might be the thing that you aspire to or you would like to work towards. Look, I'll be honest. At one point in my situation, I absolutely fantasized about having core orders for parenting matters. It was early in my separation, it was in the hardest, most frustrating moments of the process. And I found myself falling into daydreams, imagining that I had this day when I'd have this document, this official, stamped, legally binding piece of paper that said, here is the arrangement. These are the rules. This is what's going to happen from now on. Done. That was the fantasy. I thought it was almost a bit like some kind of golden ticket. I I actually fantasized about putting it putting them in a frame and and putting them on the wall as something that I'd made it through, like an achievement, and also to signal that the uncertainty was over. A decision had been made. This is the end of the conflict. We now have a framework and we can move forward and get on with our lives. So I just wonder if you might be in a situation that's similar, or if you've felt something like that too. Especially if you're in a high conflict situation, especially if you've experienced post-separation abuse, which is often a continuation of dynamics that are probably present throughout the relationship. Maybe they've been normalized dynamics, or maybe they've been internalized. Maybe these dynamics have been dismissed or overlooked. But if you've experienced coercive control, gaslighting, darvo, manipulation just to name a few. But these dynamics are where unpredictability itself is used as a weapon against you. And of course, dreaming or fantasizing about something that becomes fixed or permanent or certain, it makes sense. Of course you want that certainty. Of course you want a piece of paper or or you know what the meaning of the that's behind that paper that says the decision has been made, this is the outcome, now we know what to do to move forward. And sometimes we might even be hoping for that sense of justice that, you know, in that final orders, in those final orders, you can feel that you've been seen and heard and validated. Now, even though there's a lot of compassion and empathy around wanting this or being honest with yourself about wanting it or dreaming or fantasizing, um, it it's not necessarily the best choice or the best path. It's not a good reason to pursue formal court proceedings. And that's one of the main reasons I thought it would be useful to unpack a bit of this in today's episode. So what I've come to understand through my own lived experience, through research and education, and through working with our clients in the Danielle Black coaching ecosystem.
Reality Check On Enforcement
Brigid MorganHere's the deal. Court orders are just one pathway. They are not the only option. More importantly, I want to offer a reality check, and I am afraid that it is a bit of a harsh one. But in reality, in Australia, court orders may not be what you actually hope them to be. Even if you pursue them diligently, doggedly, at great cost, emotional cost, financial cost, in time and precious life energy, firstly, the outcome may not be what you hope for. Secondly, even if you do get the outcome you hope for in those final formal parenting court orders, there is no way to legally enforce if they are breached, apart from returning to formal court proceedings. Now, this is one of those situations where there are flaws in the family law system, especially here in Australia. My misunderstanding about formal court orders was that once that I had that certainty, once I had the framework and I knew what was to be expected of me, that there would be a path, you know, of roses going forward. There would be no more, you know, questions or challenges, that suddenly we would have an amicable working relationship, there would be nothing else to question. That's not often the case. In reality, if there are formal court orders, there is a strong possibility that they will be breached or ignored. And unfortunately, I can't say it enough, in Australia, if there is a breach, the only enforcement that you have available to you is to re-engage in court proceedings. And that means re-engaging in the system. So I just want you to digest that for a moment. Because right there the fantasy kind of starts to disintegrate. Through this episode, I did want to explore that myth that you need the core orders for parenting to feel safe, protected, empowered, and to feel like you're able to parent well in a really difficult situation. And I want to talk honestly about what these parenting orders can actually give you and what they don't. I want to share what I've learned from my own situation and what it looks like to parent without them in this particular circumstance. This approach is not right for every situation. But I think there are a lot of protective parents out there who are court adverse, exhausted, and unable to co-parent amicably or cooperatively or collaboratively, despite their best attempts. And if you're in that group right now and you're wondering if there's another way to make a solid pathway for a parenting arrangement to move forward, even in a high conflict situation, I'm here to tell you that there genuinely is. A
Bridget’s Story And Child Needs
Brigid Morganlittle bit about my story. I've got some context to share. I think it helps understand where I'm coming from. So at the time of this recording, it's been about four and a half years since separation. In my situation, it was sudden. Uh, it became high conflict very quickly. The post-separation abuse ran high and hard. I was genuinely blindsided and overwhelmed. I tried an amicable approach. I tried to stay child focused despite my own grief, rage, confusion, anxiety, fear, and while navigating betrayal trauma. I did my best to communicate clearly. I educated myself, I sought out resources, I did all the things you're supposed to do. And in fact, I almost did some things that I would have regretted very, very significantly to do with both parenting and finances. I won't go into those details here, but let's just say when you're in that triggered, flooded, overwhelmed state, you can make some poor decisions. And that's one of the biggest challenges about divorce and separation, particularly where there have been abusive dynamics or high conflict dynamics, and that is that you need to make the most calm, cognitive, regulated decisions when you are at your most dysregulated, overwhelmed, and flooded. And something we talk about in the Danielle Black coaching framework is always about nervous system regulation because being calm and credible, not only as you present to other professionals, but also in your parenting and for yourself as you make decisions. That has to be priority. Calm, credible, regulated, building your capacity and having those skills and those tools is something we can certainly support you with. I can't over express how necessary that is. And we get it. We get that it's hard, we get that it's challenging, and it almost seems impossible, and yet it must be done. So back to my story about what's relevant to today's topic. My son had significant additional needs which were undiagnosed at the time. And I, as his primary caregiver since birth, knew that he needed support. I was actively pursuing assessments and therapies. I tried to communicate these things to his father. I was met with, you know, minimizing accusations of micromanaging, uh accusations of trying to control his parenting style, active obstruction in the pursuit of therapies and diagnosis, dismissals, rebukes, enmeshment, all of the typical or textbook accusations that come when there is a primary caregiver who understands more about the child than the parent who is potentially seeking something like 50-50 care or more care than they ever had, perhaps even in the marital period or the period of the formal relationship. So as a protective parent, I didn't have any of the language, skills, resources, or supports. If you haven't guessed already, I did not find Danielle Black at this point. And things turned quite significantly for me when I did. But I knew in my heart and in my bones that the overnight care arrangements my former partner was proposing, which was 50-50, would not work for our son. For a few reasons. Number one, because of the care arrangements in themselves, the shift, the child development needs, and also, you know, everything to do with uh, you know, a child-focused perspective of why it wouldn't work for him, and adding the layer of the conflict of communication, the non-cooperation. So, you know, there was just no way that we'd be able to make timely decisions about our son's care at a 50-50 arrangement. My child has a right to. He's entitled to have timely decisions made about his health care and his support needs. And that's just one of the many things that can come out of, you know, retaining a status quo around a higher care percentage. So I digress a little bit. Um, I was definitely in a state of overwhelm and distress about my son's welfare. I absolutely felt powerless. And going about a year from the separation, I then took
Family Dispute Resolution Up Close
Brigid Morgana step that I thought might provoke a negative response, which it did, and that was to initiate family dispute resolution through Relationships Australia. There's plenty of places that you can access for mediation support. There's free services, there's paid services. What exactly is FDR? Family dispute resolution, it's a neutral third-party mediator to help parents in this situation reach an agreement. It works when there's a shared goal, genuine negotiability, and it is safe for both parties to be involved in the process. When those conditions are not present, the process does not work. My former partner and I did multiple rounds of mediation over the course of approximately two years. In total, looking back, it's about 30 hours that I did, all conducted by Shuttle online for safety reasons. It was long and laborious. Me trying above and beyond to find a way because I thought the only other choice I had was to go through formal court proceedings. So I was desperate to get this agreement through mediation. I didn't know there was any other possibility, so I stuck it out, even though it was traumatic. It was traumatic to go through that many hours of an unworkable attempt at collaboration or communication. I found that my former partner was very rigid, fixed in his position. We'd spend hours, one whole session, one whole three and a half hour mediation process. We came up with one single sentence of agreement, and that was both parties agree to engage in further mediation. Now that is a glorious waste of time, and I can only say that in hindsight. At the time I was just lost, just lost. No one deserves to go through that amount of time and torture to just have it prolonged with another attempt. Again, these are things that we can absolutely coach you and support you with. If you did want to consider mediation, if you did, if you were uncertain about how long you should engage in the process, or how to strategize well or optimize your outcome in a mediation process, coaching would be of great benefit. I didn't have any of that at the time I was in this point in my journey, but looking back, I've definitely learned a lot since. So eventually the service, as I mentioned, we used Relationships Australia Victoria, where I'm based, and there are some wonderful government or community-based organizations as well, but they deemed us unsuitable in the final leg of the two years, and we got our 60i certificate. They basically dismissed us, saying that we were unsuitable. And at that point, there was yeah, there was a bit of a standstill. We'd we had managed to come up with a very short, um, very loose sort of parenting arrangements framework, a parenting plan. I'll come back to that in a moment because this is a very key element of what I'm what I'm talking about, parenting without court orders, that you it doesn't mean that you have nothing to work with. It means that maybe you have a basic framework or maybe you have a partially completed agreement or plan. So we did have that because obviously we needed to have some some framework of how we were going to care for our child. Uh so really the mediation was about progressing out of the current arrangements, which were the status quo at the time, and that's something really important to remember as
Status Quo And Holding Ground
Brigid Morganwell. A status quo means that um it's a it's a precedent that's been set, often in formal court proceedings or in these high conflict situations. It is very challenging to go back. So it is always better to hold your ground if you are a protective parent and you firmly believe that the current arrangements are you know the best case scenario for your your child, uh, but maybe the other party is asking for more time. It is always better to hold your ground until you know you have some kind of formal intervention that says that you must give more time versus allowing more time and then saying, you know, we can sort it out later and go back to the original arrangement. So status quo basically is a way of saying, well, if it's working, we're not going to change it. So you can always increase time if you have to, because of the way things are unfolding in your particular situation. But it's very hard to change things back to less care time. So just putting a little pin in that as well is the concept of status quo. So I had managed to retain status quo as primary caregiver throughout the two years of the mediation process using that basic parenting plan that we had drafted very early in the mediation process. And then what we were unable to move further on was that progress to a higher care or equal care uh arrangement. So that never that never unfolded, but it took a lot of time and effort to uh to get there. So just coming back to this idea that a lot of parents at a point, perhaps, and this is what I felt as well, in your mediation, you might feel like you have no other choice. That if at the mediation stage you either need to give in and accept what the other parent is asking for, mediating for what they want, even knowing that what they're asking for isn't child-focused and not in the best interest of your child or children, or the only other choice is to file for court proceedings. So some parents might feel that they need something in writing, something on paper, something agreed, something signed by both parties. Other parents or protective parents might find themselves really frightened that if they don't agree, the other parent will initiate the court proceedings. Some protective parents do choose to initiate the proceedings themselves. Especially where the other parent is refusing to acknowledge the children's need. Generally, there's a lot of uncertainty about what the process involves, what the next steps are, questions, you might have questions about what parenting orders are in general, what they can actually achieve. And there is that gap space between completing mediation but it being unsuccessful. So perhaps in a less high conflict, or, you know, let's just dream for a moment. I'm assuming that if you're listening, you're not in this, you know, ideal space of an amicable separation. In an amicable separation where two healthy, mature, reasonable adults can collaborate and communicate and cooperate. That's the that's the fertile ground for a you know an amicable parenting arrangement. That's where mediation usually works best. You can come out with an agreement both parties are happy about because they both feel that it's in the child's best interests. You've got some choices there. You can just leave that good faith agreement in place, you can formalize it and sign it, you can actually submit that agreement to the court through a lawyer, have it sealed by the court, which basically means they become court orders for parenting. So basically you've made your own rather than you've had to engage in any sort of litigation or any kind of you've done the negotiations, you've got the agreement, you can just go get it stamped and have your parenting orders based on the amicable arrangement. So the catch 22 is that if you are in an amicable co-parenting situation, you've been able to communicate in a healthy way, you're both reasonable. Number one, you probably wouldn't need to have them as sealed documents because a good faith agreement will stand. You're amicable, right? You're cooperating, you're collaborating. Uh, secondly, uh, like I referred to before, if you're listening to this podcast, it's highly unlikely that you are in that situation. I think it's just worth noting that all the situations are different, but we are speaking to a specific community here, and uh that is for those of us navigating the high conflict um circumstances. For myself, family court was not a financial option. I did access a lot of community legal consultations for general guidance. I was eligible for legal aid, but I was there quietly getting my ducks in a row, having that moment, that panic between unsuccessful mediation and what next. So I was getting my research together and making a plan, but that was fortunately when I found Danielle Black, and she was my primary coach through these initial stages of that next step phase. And with support from Danielle and then the broader coaching, Danielle Black coaching framework and ecosystem, including the incredible document known as the Blueprint, which didn't exist when I first joined the community, but has since become an invaluable resource, which I could not recommend more highly. And you can you can see in the show notes and on our website more about that. But the blueprint basically answers a lot of the questions that I had going through this situation, but that Danielle answered for me as well, you know, in the one-to-one coaching space that I then engaged in. Essentially, what Danielle and I were able to do was to look at what I had achieved already through the two years at this point, two and a half years perhaps, of the negotiation process. Very strong status quo established with me as primary caregiver. My son had since then been diagnosed as neurodiverse, was able to access some NDIS supports and therapies. I was able to take on some major decision making in that process without formally having any sole parental responsibility. But at the same time, there were some changes happening in the Family Law Act, which I will come back to in a moment. Our agreement was pretty, pretty rough, pretty bare bones. It was a care schedule, and it outlined some special time like holidays and some contingencies, and that was it. Like there's a really very, very incomplete. And I I always sort of likened it to um this image of peers or women I had come to know in the circle of navigating this, who were going through similar things at the time, who had engaged court proceedings, had lawyers, had a legal team, and they were getting their parenting orders. And I was like, you've got a superhighway, like a bridge across this gorge, and it's like a concrete, you know, pillar-based suspension bridge, four-lane highway. And I am on one of those rickety old rope bridge with a couple of missing planks, and um, you know, it's just swinging with some frayed, frayed edges there on the on the rope end. And I I felt like that was comparatively parenting with orders and parenting without orders. But I've since come to learn that um, even though my little bridge is pretty bare bones, that it in my situation has offered a lot of flexibility, and along with the education, the skill building, the capacity building, I've been able to optimize that as an outcome and leverage some of the flexibility that it offers. It does require also high ethical work as well in terms of parental transparency, and you know, I I will unpack all of that in a future episode: boundaries around communication, what's expected, what's appropriate, what's right for um in general. And again, we have to keep this a bit overview because everyone's situation is so unique. Anyway, plans don't always go to plans. Uh, my dreams of either getting my parenting orders by consent, so having an agreement for mediation and submitting them to the court for getting them formalized, that didn't go to plan. That that didn't happen. And I was pretty scared and I was pretty devastated and very confused. So something I want to say is that you can change your mind if you are in a situation where you have mediation and you've come out with an agreement. Maybe it's you know not as solid or fleshed out as you would hope it to be, but it's workable. You can always change your mind at any time if the circumstances warrant it. So without formal parenting orders, your plan is essentially a good faith agreement.
Documentation And Parallel Parenting
Brigid MorganYou can make that work for you as long as you are truly child focused. It's just really important to remember that court professionals are often reluctant to make significant changes to long-standing care arrangements. Other things that are really important when you're parenting without a formal structure or the core orders to guide you. You want to make sure that you are operating with clear communication boundaries, you're understanding what you can and cannot control, and you're always staying on top of your documentation, whether that's through a formal parenting app that does the documentation time and date stamp for you, or whether it's your own process through a different type of logging app or just emailing yourself. Some people set up a special email that they just email their notes to and that automatically time date stamps. Whatever works for you. There's lots of different processes and formats and styles, but documenting observable facts about, you know, what's going on in the situation, how they impact your child and the time and the date is really important throughout this process. Cannot, again, stress more highly the power of documentation. It's like a long, slow burn. You don't think that it's doing much, but when you need it, it is a really, really powerful asset to have. So if you haven't started your documentation now, start where you're at. If you've got a documentation process, keep it going. One of the things that you can't control is how the other parent parents your child, but you can control how you parent. And that is a really important uh topic as well. And parallel parenting is another little sidestep, just so when you know that we use these terms, sometimes you can get caught up in the lingo. And I just want to make sure that everyone knows when we use these terms what we're actually talking about. And parallel parenting is what happens when co-parenting or collaborative parenting is not safe or possible, which in high conflict situation is more often than not. Um, it means disengaging from the other parent while staying deeply engaged with your child. And it is not a share it is a shared focus on the child without requiring a relationship between the adults. So that's really important to note that particularly if you are in a primary caregiver role and you are able to maintain clear boundaries and you operate in a parallel parenting style. So that can mean things like minimal contact or minimal communication with the other parent, which will reduce or minimize or mitigate conflict. Minimizing conflict is uh it is good for your child and it is good for you. So if you have to minimize contact in order to minimize conflict, then that is okay. That is a good goal to work towards. And there's a whole arena of things that come up here when we look at decision making for a child or for children. And that is a uh that is a very complex topic, and again, I'm gonna circle back to that in a moment. But what I have learned on this journey, and I want to communicate that super clear, is that you are so much more empowered as a soul parent than you realize. I didn't realize, and I had to step into that and live that reality, and I can tell you a thousand percent, you have a lot more power and influence as a soul parent than you think you may have. And when I say this, I'm talking about that deep, authentic, loving connection that you have with your child or children. Okay? Nothing can shift that. Nothing can take that away from you. Nothing that the other parent does can take that away from you. That is what you have control over. All right, it's how you parent, how you connect with your child. You can't control, and I might be repeating myself here, but this is this is the you know, this is the crux of it all. You have to realize, particularly in parallel parenting, but in any situation, you really can't control what the other parent does. But you can you can kind of mitigate it, you can you can offset it, you can lean in, right? You can make it your your voice is stronger because it is connected, not because it's louder, not because it's, you know, um it's right. It's not even right. It's it's still your style of parenting, but don't ever fear that the influence you can have on your child and children. Don't ever be afraid that it's lessened because you now have a shared care parenting arrangement and you have no control or influence over what the other parent does. You have to let that go. That has to be in the radical acceptance part of your journey, what the other parent is doing. And and I say this, you know, with the caveat, of course, that there are no genuine safety concerns, uh, that there's, you know, no violence, there's no substance misuse happening, there's appropriate places, safety for the child to sleep and to live and to be. That is in a different realm. I'm not talking about those situations. I'm talking about a share care parenting situation where you're worried about the type of dinner that the other parent is cooking or how often the other parent showers the child or helps them to bathe. Yes, these are important things. They are important, of course they matter, and that's why you, as a soul parent, you prioritize them because you love your child and you put your child first. You you you focus on their best interests, you you know the level of hygiene, you know the level of nutrition, exercise, peer connection, their developmental needs, their you know, play needs, needs for touch and contact, comfort, um, you know, sunlight, vitamin D. Like, you know all of this. You are the protective parent. You know it. What I'm saying is that you can't force or control the other parents' choices. They might not parent the way, and it's very likely that they won't parent the way that you think is best for your child. And as long as your child is safe, right? As long as there are no genuine safety concerns, you have to let that go. You can't, you just have to step away from that. And what works is that you lean into what you are empowered to do. And I I do, I really do. I feel like I can promise you this because I've experienced it, I've seen it, I've seen it working with clients, I've seen it in our ecosystem. It is true. You are very, very empowered to have a positive impact and influence on your child and your children's lives as a soul parent. It really is true. Um, on my journey, I have been fostering that deep authentic connection with my son. I practice presence and repair, I upskill as a parent, and I care for myself so that I can show up for him. And that is the real power in this situation. So I want to be clear, I don't have it all figured out. Parenting in a high conflict situation is genuinely hard. And there are days when it is really hard. And I found that parenting from a place of clarity, child focus, and intention rather than fear and reactivity, has made all the difference for both me and my son, right? And I and I wish that for you as well. And that is why, again, we talk about this uh nervous system regulation and this credibility, this calmness is so important. You're you know, you turning up for yourself and you turning up for your child and your children. I'm aware that some of this might seem a little bit repetitive, but it is complex territory and there is a lot of content, a lot of information, a lot to get your head around. Um but
What Orders Can And Cannot Do
Brigid Morganessentially I I want to land on this idea that you know there is no um dream or fantasy about the parenting court orders that solve all the problems and remove all the conflict. Your former partner, if they were high conflict or they had a parenting style that was, you know, opposite to yours or um not collaborative with yours, it's none of that's going to change because you suddenly have court orders, right? Um the orders can give you a sense of a formal, legally binding framework, um, dates, times, schedules, conditions, provisions, things like travel, um, travel arrangements, passport restrictions. Uh court orders can be really good for clarity and finality on the basics of the arrangement. Uh, court orders can give specific protective conditions where needed, and that is really important. If you are in a situation where that isn't that is relevant. So, again, we're thinking of safety issues, substance abuse, in any kind of inappropriate or concerns for capacity to care for the child. So those protective conditions in court orders, absolutely 100%, really valid, really important. What we try to communicate is that there's actually no kind of court orders police in Australia. And that's something that I think, you know, is under discussed, as I said when I opened. And it's very disappointing. It means that you could go the length of this journey, either financially invested yourself or through uh, you know, supports like legal aid or self-representing. So that's something to bear in mind that there are no court orders police in Australia, that enforcement doesn't happen as part of, you know, the arrangement when you got the formal orders delivered. Uh the only way to enforce a breach or to get them changed is to go back, and that will cost you in time, money, energy, etc. In practice, many parents are not in a position to do that. Going back to court is expensive, time consuming, and can be very traumatizing. Not always, though, I want to make sure that you know that sometimes court process can be your best choice. You know, we just want to get on with our lives and enjoy our children and do our parenting work and be humans in the world, right? So constantly engaging in these litigations or the the systems abuse of going around and around. I just want to make sure that in practice, parents with court orders are in s to some extent still relying on a quote-unquote good faith agreement. Um so the orders are there, but the enforcement still requires you to act again in a legal arena, and that action has a cost. So whether you have a parenting plan from a mediation or just a status quo that came from the relationship period through to the post-separation period, or you have co-orders, essentially it's an agreement banking on everyone, all parties involved, kind of playing by the rules. Now, with co-orders, you do have the the formal seal of the court. They are legally binding, but in Australia, the only way to take action against that is to go back through the proceedings of court. There's one more thing that's worth sitting with before we head towards a wrap-up. And again, like I said, this is a super complex topic, and you know, lots of other side quests I am noting to do in future parts on this, but I don't want to overwhelm you all while you're
When Details Become Weapons
Brigid Morganhere. Just want to mention a few things that sometimes things can get missed off-court orders altogether. I actually have peers, friends that this has happened to, but once the orders are made and sealed, that item, that issue, that concern is no longer on the table unless you go back to court. So they have just missed out. Lawyers aren't perfect, and legal teams can make mistakes. There's a lot happening in negotiation tables, and sometimes even the legal team may agree with you that they that an item should be on the orders, and yeah, maybe it's a mistake or maybe it gets deprioritized. Uh, so that can happen. And there's actually some other flaws that can happen within parenting court orders as well. Sometimes uh there can be restrictions that come from it. If every single detail is locked down into this uh agreement, um, in high conflict situations, this detailed you know, list of orders can give the other parent more to work with, more levers to pull, every provision can be a potential trigger point, and they can be leveraged against you. A lot of these core orders are reciprocal in nature, so you have to be willing to agree to what is allowed for the other parent as they vice versa to you. Often in these situations, we're not dealing with mature, healthy, regulated individuals, and they may be looking for ways to weaponize some of these conditions against us. So, you know, one example uh for my situation again, I didn't have formal orders, but in the mediation process I was very aware of uh anything that I might do that could be considered bad parenting or or that would be held against me. And I had read somewhere that punctuality to school was a really important uh element, and I am a diligent parent, but I got to the point where I felt like I was parenting under a microscope, and I was so terrified of being even five minutes late. And I do remember this. I remember walking my son to school, and we got to the crossing guard, and we'd missed the we'd missed the light. And I was just in a panic and I was dysregulated. And what happened in that moment? I was so triggered, traumatized, stressed that I couldn't be a good present parent. I actually broke down in front of the crossing guard because we were like five minutes late to school. And fortunately, you know, I was able to gather myself together and repair with my son and be calm for him. On my way back after dropping him off, I had a hug with the crossing guard and thanked her for her compassion and support. What a lovely human being. And I was able to come home and, you know, just work out what had gone on for me. And later when I'd come into the Daniel Black coaching framework, I realized that that feeling of hyper-vigilance, of being always under the microscope for every parenting decision I was making, because I felt like I could lose everything at any moment, that was debilitating. And I wouldn't wish that on anyone. So again, a lot of this work is about educating you so that you can make informed decisions about not only how you parent, but how you move through this post-separation period, how you can optimize the outcome using strategy and knowledge, as well as your capacity being built and strengthened in the process so that things can land in a child-focused way to support the best interests of your child. So this is one of the reasons, just one of the reasons that so many parents work with the coaches in the Daniel Black coaching ecosystem. We've got a really deep understanding of these experiences and about what parenting plans and parenting orders involved. We know what to consider, we know it intimately and we know it evidence-based. And we understand controlling conflictual co-parenting situations. A lot of law professionals, family law professionals, do not have that depth of understanding. They are there to achieve an outcome. Same with mediators. They are neutral third parties and they are trained and skilled, but they are not there to listen to the case. They're there to to to your case. They're there to help the two parents communicate and come to a decision. They have no decision-making power, right? So if you already struggle to communicate or to agree, mediation may or may not help you. And again, that's something to unpack in an individual session or to do your own research through the blueprint, which is an incredible resource. But these are the kinds of things that you want to understand before you make decisions about what path you're going to go down, court or no court, mediation, no mediation. These are the things you want to understand before you, you know, you decide even what arrangements might look like. Not even how to make an agreement with the other, with the other parent, but what do they look like? What is actually best for your child? So some things are never going to be truly enforceable, but you can manage your expectations, optimize your outcome, and retain your position as a protective parent who is genuinely child-focused. I used to think that the core orders, the parenting orders, would give me certainty and they would have my back, and I wouldn't have any more problems once I had them. But I have come to understand that for many parents it's an appearance of certainty, and the reality is still actually very messy and unpredictable. Basically, because the other parent is still who they are, orders or not. In upcoming episodes, I will unpack a little bit more of the practical nitty-gritties of how to make this work, specific strategies, practices, and approaches. There's lots of things to think about, lots of ways to protect your own well-being as well as retain that position of protective parenting. And again, I'll just repeat that one of the most powerful things that I've learned through experience and through education here at Daniel Black Coaching is about leaning into your role as the primary caregiver, owning the influence that you actually have, which is so significant. Research shows that a child or children only needs one healthy, present, attuned caregiver to thrive. And if this is resonating with you, that healthy, present, aligned parent is very likely you. So we will go deeper into that in the future.
When Orders Matter Most
Brigid MorganThere are situations where formal court orders are important, including but not limited to. If there is a real present risk of the other parent retaining or withholding a child or not returning them to you. If there is a risk of the other parent relocating interstate or internationally without your consent, you need legal advice and real support. If the other parent's parenting capacity is so seriously compromised that specific protective conditions need to be formalized, such as professional supervision, regular drug testing, alcohol testing prior to transitions, and so on, you need advice and real support. If you do not hold primary care and arrangements are genuinely contested and unstable, the status quo protection I've been describing throughout the episode doesn't apply in the same way. You need advice and real support. That said, and this is important, some of the above can actually be implemented without parenting orders. For example, a primary parent can refuse to facilitate the children's spending time or overnight time with the other parent until that parent provides a clean hair follicle test or purchase a breathalyzer device and provides a zero reading before changeovers. Also, professionally supervised time can be insisted upon without parenting orders. The other parent can initiate proceedings if they're unhappy, but it's important that parents know you don't have to wait for court orders to put these protections in place. It's also worth noting that a lot of our clients are the respondent, meaning that the former partner is the one who's initiated the court proceedings. Now, if that's your situation, please do reach out. We are here to help. And no podcast episode, including this one, for as as kind of rambling and shambolic as it is, trying to communicate a wealth of knowledge, experience, and understanding, and that's why I've had to break them up into several. But no podcast episode is a substitute for prop advice about what's right for you. Don't ever feel that you need to give in or be pressurized or bullied. You are the protective parent, you are the one who understands your child best. So please do reach out for one-to-one coaching that can really help you with unpacking whether this parenting without orders might be a viable and beneficial option for you. Every relational dynamic is different. What I hope is that you come away with permission to question the assumption, if you had one or if anyone's pressurizing you to have one, that court orders are automatically the right path. We here at Daniel Black Coaching just want you to be able to make an informed decision. Permission to sit with your own situation and ask, what does protection actually look like for me? What arrangement genuinely serves my child or children? And what would it mean to parent from a place of intention and clarity rather than fear? There are so many more ways to get through this experience. And again, you are not alone. You are never alone. I wanted to also just reference episode 95. It's the collaboration question: when it works and when it doesn't. So collaboration is often presented as the gold standard after separation. Parents are encouraged to communicate openly, to compromise, to work together, and to have a collaborative approach. Now, when that is possible, yes, it can be an incredibly beneficial process. However, if you are in a high conflict situation where cooperative, clear, honest, collaborative communication and practices is not possible, then this is not a pathway to pursue. I encourage you to listen to episode 95 for more on that. That's it for me. Thank you so much for being here today and listening to this episode. This topic sits so close to my heart, and I hope something in it has been useful for you, or at least it's opened a door to questions that you can reflect on, or some options that you might be able to consider and sit with. So just a gentle reminder that this episode is educational in nature. It's not legal advice and it's not therapy, but it is designed to help you think more clearly and strategically about your situation and to know that you are not alone in navigating it. I look forward to connecting with you again soon. Thanks so much for listening.
Danielle’s Add-On And Court Aversion
Danielle BlackA big thank you to Bridget for her contribution on the Post-Separation Abuse podcast this week. And I know I'm not the only one who's going to be looking forward to hearing from Bridget again, particularly on this really important topic of parenting without orders. I wanted to provide some additional information and insight on this topic because it's something that we have extensive experience with here at Daniel Black Coaching. In fact, many of our clients over the years and currently are parenting without court orders. And that's in fact how many people come to us initially, even if they later on end up in the court system. And as Bridget mentioned, the vast majority of our clients who have ever been in the court system or are currently in the court system tend to be the respondents in court proceedings, which means that their former partner is the one who has initiated the proceedings. Part of why this ends up being the case, you might be curious about this, is because we are very court averse here at Danielle Black Coaching. We do take the view that litigation and court proceedings should be a last resort. We take the view that there are many things that can be implemented without needing to go to court to engage in expensive and lengthy litigation, and Brigid touched on some of those during her episode. She mentioned the hair follicle testing, the use of personal breathalyzer devices such as backtrack if there's a concern with the non-primary caregivers' alcohol consumption or the use of other substances. She mentioned the fact that supervised time at a professional children's contact centre can also be implemented without there being parenting orders in place. Now I know what some of you might be thinking, and that is, but Danielle, there's absolutely no way that my former partner would agree to that. And this is why I'm jumping
When Your Ex Won’t Agree
Danielle Blackin. What to do when your former partner is insisting on something that you don't think is safe or appropriate, that you are wanting to hold firm on something that you think provides that safety and that mitigation of harm to your kids, but you can't come to agreement. That's a reality that so many of our clients have faced. Let's be honest. You could be putting forward in mediation that you want all parenting time to begin with a date and time stamped 0.00 blood alcohol reading before the children's time with that parent commences, for example. Are they likely to agree to that either just in communication with you or in mediation? Fuck no, they're not. The vast majority of them are not. They're going to insist that they don't actually have a problem, that you're imagining things, that your sense of what's an appropriate amount of alcohol is way off base, that you're manufacturing things, on and on and on it goes. I know I'm not telling you anything that you don't already know. So then we have a bit of a stalemate, what next? Well, many, many parents make the mistake of thinking that their only options then are to engage with lawyers, to engage in back and forth legal correspondence, to initiate court proceedings potentially, or to just simply give up and comply with what the other parent is seeking or with what they're willing to do, or okay, well if you won't agree to the safety measures, I guess we don't get to have the safety measures. Now, are those things options? Absolutely. Are they the only options?
You Can Set Conditions Anyway
Danielle BlackNo. There is a huge misconception that after separation that you actually have to seek the other parent's agreement on what you want to implement. You don't. In the absence of court orders, you don't have to agree on anything, really. There is no law that requires you to seek their agreement before implementing something. Again, this is why so many clients come to us in the first place, particularly if they've been in relationships where there has been an imbalance with power, with decision making, whether there has been anything that would be determined as family violence or coercive control or not, many of our clients have struggled with setting appropriate boundaries, with actually holding firm on literally anything with their former partner, and they don't actually realize that they have the power to do that. And so require some support and some guidance, and that's where we're able to help. So, for example, in the situation of the backtrack testing or the hair follicle testing, it can be appropriate in situations where there has been drug use, even just recreational drug use, or if you're concerned about alcohol consumption, whether that's nightly increased consumption or whether that's binge drinking consumption, that leads you to have concerns about the other parent's parenting capacity, their ability to be tuned in and responsive to the children if they've had however much to drink, whatever it might be specific to your situation, if you're concerned about those things and want there to be safety measures in place to ensure that they're not actually continuing to take drugs andor that they're not under the influence of alcohol when your children are in their care, you can refuse to facilitate your children spending time with the other parent if that other parent will not agree to those things. Yes, you heard me correctly. In the absence of parenting orders, you are able to communicate that you will only be facilitating time if certain requirements are met. Now, there might be some of you listening who have just had a very intense nervous system response at me saying that, at the mere thought of setting a firm boundary and making it clear that you will not be facilitating parenting time unless certain things are put in place, unless certain things are agreed to. I get
Boundaries When Your Body Panics
Danielle Blackit. I've been in your situation. I've been in a situation where I was parenting without court orders for the better part of a decade, and in my situation, it was not some amicable, smooth-sailing, child-focused paradise. I was continually acquiescing to the demands of my former partner. I was not being protective of my child. I was about as far from being a protective parent as you could get. I was a very conflict-avoidant parent. The mere thought of setting a boundary with my former partner would, you know, break me out in a cold sweat and heart palpitations. And I know that there are some of you listening who can understand that and appreciate that and possibly sympathise with that because you know exactly what it feels like. And I have very deep regret, and I have compassion for myself, and I understand why I was in that situation. I understand why I made the decisions that I made. And if I could go back in time and change it, I would. Because there is still part of me that feels that there's just no excuse for what I allowed to happen to my child. And that's why Danielle Black coaching exists. It doesn't exist because we're warriors for justice. You know, I'm not sure that there is really any such thing as genuine justice on this path. Fundamentally, we're warriors for those of us in this experience leveling up, expanding our capacity, getting to a place where traumatized or not, healed or not, comfortable or not, we can stand up and protect our kids. Even when it's hard. Even when our nervous system is on fire saying, Girl, what the fuck? What are you doing? Seriously? You know that he's not gonna like that. No, he's not gonna fucking like it. And when you're a protective parent, you do it anyway. You do it anyway, and it feels like shit. And that's why our clients connect with ours. So that when they're in the midst of it feeling like shit, they can connect with their coach or with other women in our community and talk about what it is that they're experiencing. And inevitably they survive, they realise that that was a really intense experience when they set a boundary and maintained it and refused to facilitate arrangements that they did not think were safe or appropriate. They survive, they come out the other side and they hold the boundary again. And then they hold the boundary again. And then their former partner recruits family members and friends and threatens legal action, and do you really think that you're doing the right thing by a child, denying them access to me, their other parent? You're a terrible mother. Blah blah blah blah blah. I've heard it all. So much of that has been said to me uh when I eventually did become protective. I know the playbook. I know how it feels when you're on the receiving end of those things. I know how it feels when you're doubting yourself, when you're doubting whether or not what you're holding firm on is appropriate, when you're then confused, when you're questioning yourself. Again, that's why Danielle Black Coaching exists, that's why the blueprint exists. Because I recognize that there was such a huge gap that we needed something in this space to help parents who just didn't have any idea what the fuck they were doing, but still wanted to protect their kids anyway. So I'm here saying that whether or not you go to mediation or not, if you don't have an agreement with the other parent about the parenting arrangements, that does not mean that the only option is court or to acquiesce and just agree with whatever they're putting forward. You can stay firm, you can say no, I disagree, I don't think what you're proposing is appropriate for our children. What I'm willing to facilitate is and then you outline what the child focused parenting arrangements that you are willing to facilitate are. That might be supervised time at a professional contact centre, that might be time whereby they have to be providing you with a 0.00 blood alcohol concentration reading prior to any changeover. There's a whole range of protective measures that can be put in place without court orders. Oftentimes what our clients have found is that when they've actually stayed firm on those things, either their former partner has complied ultimately, if they genuinely want to spend time with the children, that's what they will do, whether we're talking professionally supervised time for a period of time. Professionally supervised time is rarely forever. However, we do have clients whereby ultimately no contact was deemed appropriate or whereby there's been prolonged supervision. So if you speak to a professional supervision service and they tell you that you can only access it for eight weeks or twelve weeks or whatever, well, I'm calling bullshit because I've got many clients that have actually been utilizing the services of professional supervision for years. There is a bit of a spiel whereby people are often under the impression of they're often told That professional supervision is just for a very, very short period of time. That's the ideal. But the reality looks very, very different. And so if you're confused about this or you're wanting advice about this, please do reach out. But all of this to say, all kinds of things can be put in place. Non-primary caregivers have often ultimately agreed in order to maintain contact and a relationship with the children in a way that is safe and appropriate. Whether they think it's necessary, you know, they can be kicking and screaming the whole way. I'm not suggesting that, you know, they're going to be skipping along enjoying every moment of this. But again, that's what protective parenting is often about. It's not about avoiding conflict for the sake of avoiding all of the conflict. It's not about avoiding conflict if the trade-off is that our kids are potentially exposed to safety concerns or other harms. Being a protective parent is often about holding the line, holding firm on an expectation and a boundary, whether the other parent is happy with that or not, and actually being able to withstand somebody else's discomfort. The discomfort of knowing that the former partner is pissed off. It does get easier over time when you hold those boundaries. In fact, the only way to get comfortable with holding boundaries and with being a protective parent is just to fucking do it. And then you do it again, and then you do it again, and then you do it again and again and again, and you keep doing it again until you've increased your capacity, you've built that muscle. Is it ever going to feel completely comfortable where you don't have to give it a second thought where there's no nervous system response? Well, I'm not going to make that guarantee. Everybody's journey is different. But it does get infinitely easier each time you set and maintain a boundary. And is there a chance that a former partner is just going to completely crack the shits and make good on a threat to initiate court proceedings? Yes. Sometimes the first thing that they do is run to a lawyer. Sometimes they threaten legal action for months and months and months. In my case it was twelve months. My ex threatened legal action for twelve months until he actually initiated any sort of legal action. It's different
Threats Letters And Empty Bluffs
Danielle Blackin all situations. Depends on the appetite genuinely of the other parent to engage in that litigation and incidentally to pay for that litigation. This is also where a bit of the strategy comes into play. Because if your former partner doesn't have two brass pennies to rub together and doesn't have anybody else willing to foot the bill, then oftentimes a threat to commence court proceedings is an empty threat because they find out how much it's all going to cost them and realize that they simply can't because they don't have any money. What a shame. If your former partner, on the other hand, does have access to finances, whether of their own or that of a friend or family member who's willing to unfortunately foot the bill for someone who's potentially seeking something that is unsafe and inappropriate, that's when we can see legal action. We can see strongly worded legal letters about unilateral decision making and withholding and gatekeeping and not in the best interests of the children, and do you really think this is child focused? And all of that sort of other bullshit that, yeah, you might be reading between the lines here and thinking, gee, I wonder if Danielle has actually received some of those legal letters in her own situation. How did you guess? You know I did. You know I was accused of all of those things. When I eventually levelled up and became protective, of course I was labelled with all of those things. Of course I was accused of parental alienation. I mean it couldn't possibly be because what my ex was seeking was not appropriate, and that harm had been caused to my child. Surely not. Apologies, I'm being a little bit facetious here. But of course you have to expect that there's going to be some strongly worded legal letters from some pompous assholes. That are doing nothing except taking on board your ex's narrative. Try not to get too worried about that. Legal letters in themselves carry very little weight. They have no authority ultimately in the grand scheme of things if there are no court orders in place. You do need to pay attention to them. It can be appropriate to respond either yourself or by seeking representation. Again, if you're interested in unpacking what your options are for that, that's also what we're here for. We don't provide legal advice, but we can help you to understand what options are open to you so that you can then make an informed decision yourself going forward. And you might end up in the court system, obviously, if they've taken the decision to move forward with an application to the court. And that's always very entertaining when you see what they've what they're seeking and what their accusations about you are, and the way that they've framed things, and the way that you know damn well that they did fuck all genuine attuned parenting. That might not be true in every case, obviously, but you know, if you're listening to the post-separation abuse podcast, I'm assuming that it's potentially true for you. Uh yet they're claiming that they have either been the primary caregiver or that primary care was shared jointly. I mean, that always just gives me a giggle, frankly. And you will have the opportunity to respond, and you will have the opportunity to be seeking the protective things that you're seeking. And where there has been things like recreational drug use, where there are other concerns, obviously it's dependent upon the age of the children. There's so many different factors, which again is why this is very generalist information. If you're wanting specific information specific to your situation, I highly recommend that you consider accessing the blueprint if you haven't already, or that you book a call with someone on our team, because these are the sorts of things that we can help parents to understand just what options are available, what path might be the best one for you. But incidentally, a lot of the grumpy former partners that initiate court proceedings can be quite surprised when the court actually thinks that hair follicle testing, breathalyzer testing, professionally supervised visits are actually all very sensible ideas. And that has happened for so many, look, honestly, more clients than I can count. That has happened with. Our clients have been holding firm when there have been no orders in place, the other parent storms off in a huff and either threatens legal action for a really long period of time and then ultimately just complies, or they actually carry through with their threat to commence litigation and things end up in the court system, and lo and behold, the court system actually thinks that what the protective parent has been seeking all along is actually very appropriate on an interim basis because of the safety concerns.
Courts Often Back Safety Measures
Danielle BlackImportant to note that the burden of proof in family law proceedings is actually very different to criminal law. A lot of people are worried that because they might not have hard and fast quote unquote proof of recreational drug taking or excessive consumption of alcohol, they worry that that's never going to be taken seriously by the court, so why bother? I might as well just give in and let all of those safety mitigation things go. No, incorrect. You do not need to have high levels of proof when you're in family court. That is a big misconception. Now, this is not legal advice. Obviously, you would be engaging with a lawyer most likely if you were going to be responding to an application in family court. But please do not underestimate the weight that can be given, particularly on an interim basis, to your observations and lived experiences during the course of that relationship. All this to say that please don't be thinking that because your former partner is not going to agree to no overnights or to supervised time for a period of time until they can prove that they are clean and not using any drug, or that they are sober when they're caring for your children. Please don't be thinking that because your ex doesn't agree to any of those things and there's no orders in place, that you're then stuck and have nowhere to go and just simply have to acquiesce because you need an agreement, you need to agree, you need some certainty. That's not true. Your nervous system is going to want some certainty. Your nervous system is going to want to see that there's something on paper and agreed and signed. But just because your nervous system wants it doesn't mean that that's actually reality. It doesn't mean that that's actually factually how things need to be in order to progress things. And this is where coaching can help. Particularly if you've listened to any of this and it's resonating with you and you're thinking, hey, I think I need to talk to somebody on the Danielle Black Coaching team. Please do reach out. You can head to the website Danielleblackcoaching.com.au where you will find lots of information, info about the blueprint, information about the coaches, you can book with us. My books at the time of recording this are currently full. I'm hoping that they're going to open up a little bit in the near future, but nevertheless, both Trudy and Bridget are experienced. They can help you. And we have the blueprint. And I am not for a second suggesting that any of this is easy. So if you're thinking, oh well Danielle, but it's easy for you to say, but you don't understand, you don't understand my ex. I'm just gonna stop you right there and say that for most of you listening, I understand a lot more than what you think I do. Just because I'm at the other side does not mean that I don't still remember, not just cognitively but somatically, you know, in my body and on a nervous system level what it was like when my ex was not agreeing to things that were appropriate and safe for our child and that I was acquiescing and that I felt unable to hold firm on anything, that I felt unable to protect my child. I remember that all too well. But what you may not realize is how you will feel if you don't level the fuck up and protect your child. I know how that feels. I know how the guilt and the grief feels knowing the harm that was caused that I didn't prevent, knowing that I wasn't protective. And again, please don't ever use my coaching or Bridget's coaching or Trudy's coaching, you know, any of our coaching against yourself. This is not about blame and shame, but it is about being really fucking brutally honest. And that can sometimes land really hard. I know that that can trigger a lot of you listening potentially to feel really defensive, to feel seen in a way that's really uncomfortable. And I'm not going to apologize for that, because I think sometimes we really do need to look at ourselves and feel that discomfort, because truly, if you're feeling a level of discomfort, my guess is that it's because something that I'm saying is landing with you as being accurate, as being true. And none of this is about shame and blame, you know, that would be a really easy, superficial thing to just throw the fucking airpods across the room and say that bitch can just fuck off. What the fuck does she know? She doesn't know my life. No, I don't know your life, but I know what it's like to not protect your child and then have to live with that for the rest of your life after the fact. I know what that's like because that's my life, and I don't want that for you, and I certainly don't want that for your kids. I have immense compassion for the mother that I was, for the traumatized mother that I was, for the stuck mother that I was, for the frightened mother that I was. I have so much compassion for that version of me all of those years ago. And for me, there is no amount of self-compassion, there is no amount of healing, there is no amount of
The Cost Of Not Protecting
Danielle Blackhelping other mothers, there is no amount of knowing that other children are protected, there is no amount of kind words from clients or from strangers that will ever take away the grief, the guilt, and the pain that I carry knowing that my child was harmed because I didn't act when I needed to. And I did not at all intend this closing to Bridget's episode to take such an emotional turn, to take such a potentially dark turn. But if you've listened to this podcaster for any length of time, if you are one of my one-on-one coaching clients, if you've connected with us at all, if you know anything about me, you know, rightly or wrongly, I'm honest. I'm honest about my experience. I'm honest about what I see happening in this system. And I'm being honest here with you in this moment. I know that taking action can be incredibly difficult. I know that holding a line and holding a boundary can be incredibly difficult. I know that there is that urge to just fall back into the, but I I can't do it, I'm traumatized, he's going to be angry, it's too hard, it's just easier in this moment to agree. You know, the anticipatory compliance is very real. Again, I know because I lived it for so long. You know, my middle name could have been anticipatory compliance for a decade. And I don't want that for you. So whether you're planning separation, whether you're newly separated, whether you're planning for mediation, whether you've just got that lovely worded legal letter accusing you of all the things and you're thinking that you're going to be in the court system sometime soon, or maybe you are in the court system. Quite literally, wherever you are in your journey, we can help. The blueprint can help. The coaches here at Danielle Black Coaching can help. This is what we do. This is why we're here. And I know I speak for both Bridget and Trudy, our current SANU coaches here at Danielle Black Coaching. I know I speak for both of them when I say thank you so much for being here with us for this episode. Thank you so much for being willing to consider the information that we're providing. Thank you so much to those of you who have already invested in yourself and your children with this work, whether that's by purchasing the blueprint, whether that's by working with us one-on-one. However, it is that you're doing this work, we thank you sincerely. And I'm not sure who you're going to be hearing from next week, but whichever one of us you do hear from, we'll look forward to chatting with you then.